In N Out vs. Five Guys: A Sensory Evaluation of Two Primo Burger Joints

In N Out vs. Five Guys: A Sensory Evaluation of Two Primo Burger Joints

In N Out vs. Five Guys

Disclosure: Crummy iPhone pictures are stand ins for the I-wish-I-brought-my-DSLR-with-me but what are you gonna do? Deal with it. Also, I have a feeling you might want a burger after you read this so be prepared.

 

Typically I maintain a healthy diet. But every now and again the fat kid in me needs a little junk food. You know what I mean right? I’m sure there is a little fast food that hits that junk food craving spot for you.

 

In N Out Burger in CA is so bomb. I would like some right now. In the Midwest people claim that Five Guys is awesome and comparable or better then In N Out Burger. So of course I had to taste for myself. A true scientist would say the sensory evaluation could not be properly carried out because I don’t have an In N Out Burger to directly compare to my Five Guys burger. Thankfully, I’ve eaten many In N Out Burgers and have a good idea of the taste, texture, and amazing-ness of the burger. But to maintain a highly rigorous sensory testing atmosphere I have decided to compare a 1 burger patty cheeseburger which is what I would order at In N Out and regular French fries.

I am just gonna break it down:

Five Guys Cheeseburger:

Pro:

  • Larger patty
  • Sandwich with toppings much larger volume
  • Add-on’s are all free
  • Peanuts available for consumption while waiting in line
  • Thicker cut french fries with more skin left on, homestyle ( a pro in some books not mine, but some)

Con:

  • Super greasy French fries
  • French fry portion too large for one person (small serves 1-2)
  • Burger patty dry
  • Grilled onions- not so grilled
  • No special sauce
  • Cheese not completely melted
  • Burger toppings flavor-less (lettuce, tomato, etc)
  • Served in a greasy paper bag even when dinning in
  • Cheeseburger has 840 Calories and 55g of fat

In N out Cheeseburger:

Pro:

  • Moist patty
  • Fresher toppings (tomatoe, lettuce, etc.)
  • Special Sauce
  • Fresh French fries, thin cut. Processed in front of you.
  • Real grilled onions
  • Cheeseburger has 480 Calories and 27g of fat.
  • You can add “animal style” to any order

Con:

  • Limited menu selection
  • Thinner patty
  • Few locations outside of California

The following conclusion may be drawn from the above information: In N Out stomps on Five Guys. Period. End of story. I think what happened here is five guys, literally five dudes, traveled to California had In N Out and were like wow this is bomb lets start a restaurant like this. Oaky, that’s not really what happened, but it sounds better then some family had five kids and started a restaurant.  That being said I did eat my entire burger although as aforementioned it was hella dry. If you’re going to make a larger patty it’s crucial that it’s moist and juicy and finger licking good. Not the case. However, the fries were another story, I was fully disgusted in the grease bath that was the French fries. One of a couple of things can happen to create disgustingly greasy French fries; I suspect that the oil was not hot enough when the potatoes were fried thus resulting in extra oil logged fries as they soak up large amounts of oil when the oil is not properly heated to the correct temperature.

(even this crummy photo can show the grease soaked fires)

The calorie and grams of fat difference between the two burgers is substantial Five Guys coming in at almost double the calories of its In N Out counter part, totally not worth it in my opinion. All in all my experience at Five Guys would deter me from a return trip to the restaurant, in other words I’ll wait till I visit California again for a nice fresh In N Out burger!

 

Discolusre: The opinions of this article are my opinions, I was not paid or offered any compensation in the reviewing of these restaurants.

 

The In N Out and Five Guys logos are registered trademarks of the respective restaurants and have been used from their respective corporate websites.

College Students eat 5 servings of fruits and veg a week!

College students get low grade on eating fruits and vegetables

By Jeannine Stein, Los Angeles Times / For the Booster Shots blog

August 17, 2011, 2:38 p.m.
College students may be going heavy on the books, but they could be light on fruits and vegetables, a study finds. Many may not be eating even one serving a day.

Researchers surveyed 582 college students, most of them freshmen, to find out about their eating habits. As far as the fruits and vegetables were concerned, male students ate about five servings a week, while females consumed about four per week. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines suggest about two to two and a half cups of fruit and about two and a half to three and a half cups of vegetables per day for this age group. Under the CDC guidelines, a cup of fruit equals one small apple or banana; a cup of vegetables would be 12 baby carrots.
Overall women had better eating habits than men–they skipped fewer meals, were more apt to read food labels, ate fast food less frequently, and ate in the dining halls more often. They consumed less fiber than men, however.

Men ate more fat than women, although both sexes consumed more than 30% of their calories from fat, a no-no according to the American Dietetic Assn.

Even after considering the meals the students skipped, researchers found they were not even getting one serving of fruits and vegetables per day on average.

“We are not teaching youth how to be self-sustaining,” said study co-author Brad Cardinal in a news release. Cardinal, professor of exercise and sport science at Oregon State University in Corvallis, added, “Home economics and nutrition classes have all but disappeared from our schools in the K-12 system. There is a fundamental lack of understanding on how to eat well in a very broad sense.”

The authors noted that it may take a multi-prong approach to improve college students’ nutrition: “Some of the points of intervention include peers, classmates, dormitory management, on and off-campus eating establishments, and many other campus groups and organizations.”

The study was released online in the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior.